When Does Ionization Energy Increase

7.4: Ionization Energy

Last updated
Save as PDF

Page ID: 21740

Learning Objectives

To correlate ionization energies with the chemistry of the elements

We have seen that when elements react, they often gain or lose enough electrons to accomplish the valence electron configuration of the nearest element of group 0. Why is this then? In this department, we develop a more quantitative approach to predicting such reactions by examining periodic trends in the free energy changes that back-trail ion formation.

Ionization Energies

Because atoms do not spontaneously lose electrons, free energy is required to remove an electron from an atom to form a cation. Chemists define the ionization free energy (\(I\)) of an chemical element every bit the amount of energy needed to remove an electron from the gaseous atom \(Due east\) in its ground country. \(I\) is therefore the free energy required for the reaction

\[ E_{(g)} \rightarrow E^+_{(g)} +east^- \;\;\ \text{energy required=I } \characterization{seven.4.1} \]

Considering an input of energy is required, the ionization free energy is always positive (\(I > 0\)) for the reaction equally written in Equation \(\PageIndex{1}\). Larger values of I hateful that the electron is more tightly bound to the atom and harder to remove. Typical units for ionization energies are kilojoules/mole (kJ/mol) or electron volts (eV):

\[1\; eV/atom = 96.49\; kJ/mol \nonumber \]

If an atom possesses more one electron, the amount of energy needed to remove successive electrons increases steadily. We can ascertain a first ionization energy (\(I_1\)), a second ionization energy (\(I_2\)), and in general an nth ionization energy (\(I_n\)) according to the following reactions:

\[ \ce{E(g) \rightarrow E^+(g) +e^-} \;\;\ I_1=\text{1st ionization free energy} \label{7.4.2} \]

\[ \ce{E^{+}(yard) \rightarrow Due east^{2+}(grand) +due east^-} \;\;\ I_2=\text{2nd ionization energy} \label{7.4.3} \]

\[ \ce{E^{2+}(g) \rightarrow E^{3+}(grand) +e^-} \;\;\ I_3=\text{3rd ionization free energy} \label{7.iv.4} \]

Values for the ionization energies of \(Li\) and \(Exist\) listed in Table \(\PageIndex{i}\) evidence that successive ionization energies for an element increment as they go; that is, it takes more energy to remove the second electron from an atom than the kickoff, and so forth. In that location are ii reasons for this trend. First, the 2nd electron is existence removed from a positively charged species rather than a neutral ane, and so in accord with Coulomb's police, more than free energy is required. Second, removing the first electron reduces the repulsive forces among the remaining electrons, and then the attraction of the remaining electrons to the nucleus is stronger.

Successive ionization energies for an element increment.

Table \(\PageIndex{1}\): Ionization Energies (in kJ/mol) for Removing Successive Electrons from Li and Be. Source: Data from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (2004).
Reaction	Electronic Transition	\(I\)	Reaction	Electronic Transition	\(I\)
\(\ce{Li (chiliad)\rightarrow Li^+ (g) + e^-}\)	\(1s^22s^1 \rightarrow 1s^ii\)	I ₁ = 520.two	\(\ce{Be (g) \rightarrow Be^+(chiliad) + eastward^-}\)	\(1s^22s^2 \rightarrow 1s^22s^one\)	I ₁ = 899.five
\(\ce{Li^+(g) \rightarrow Li^{2+}(g) +due east^-}\)	\(1s^2 \rightarrow 1s^1\)	I ₂ = 7298.two	\(\ce{Be^+(thou) \rightarrow Be^{2+}(g) + e^-}\)	\(1s^22s^i \rightarrow 1s^2\)	I ₂ = 1757.1
\(\ce{Li^{2+} (g) \rightarrow Li^{3+}(yard) + east^-}\)	\(1s^1 \rightarrow 1s^0\)	I ₃ = 11,815.0	\(\ce{Be^{2+}(g) \rightarrow Be^{3+}(g) + e^-}\)	\(1s^two \rightarrow 1s^i\)	I ₃ = 14,848.8
			\(\ce{Be^{3+}(g) \rightarrow Be^{four+}(g) + e^-}\)	\(1s^1 \rightarrow 1s^0\)	I _four = 21,006.6

The increment in successive ionization energies, nevertheless, is not linear, but increases drastically when removing electrons in lower \(n\) orbitals closer to the nucleus. The most important consequence of the values listed in Tabular array \(\PageIndex{1}\) is that the chemical science of \(\ce{Li}\) is dominated past the \(\ce{Li^+}\) ion, while the chemical science of \(\ce{Be}\) is dominated by the +2 oxidation state. The free energy required to remove the second electron from \(\ce{Li}\):

\[\ce{Li^+(g) \rightarrow Li^{2+}(g) + e^-} \label{vii.4.5} \]

is more than 10 times greater than the energy needed to remove the offset electron. Similarly, the energy required to remove the third electron from \(\ce{Exist}\):

\[\ce{Be^{2+}(g) \rightarrow Be^{3+}(thousand) + e^-} \label{7.4.6} \]

is about 15 times greater than the energy needed to remove the first electron and around 8 times greater than the energy required to remove the 2d electron. Both \(\ce{Li^+}\) and \(\ce{Be^{2+}}\) accept anesouth ^two closed-shell configurations, and much more energy is required to remove an electron from the anes ² core than from the 2southward valence orbital of the same element. The chemical consequences are enormous: lithium (and all the alkali metals) forms compounds with the ane+ ion but not the 2+ or three+ ions. Similarly, beryllium (and all the element of group i globe metals) forms compounds with the ii+ ion just not the 3+ or 4+ ions. The free energy required to remove electrons from a filled core is prohibitively big and simply cannot be achieved in normal chemical reactions.

The free energy required to remove electrons from a filled core is prohibitively big under normal reaction conditions.

Ionization Energy: Ionization Free energy, YouTube(opens in new window) [youtu.exist] (opens in new window)

Ionization Energies of s- and p-Block Elements

Ionization energies of the elements in the third row of the periodic table exhibit the same pattern as those of \(Li\) and \(Be\) (Table \(\PageIndex{2}\)): successive ionization energies increment steadily as electrons are removed from the valence orbitals (3s or 3p, in this example), followed by an especially large increase in ionization energy when electrons are removed from filled core levels as indicated by the bold diagonal line in Table \(\PageIndex{2}\). Thus in the 3rd row of the periodic table, the largest increase in ionization energy corresponds to removing the quaternary electron from \(Al\), the 5th electron from Si, and so forth—that is, removing an electron from an ion that has the valence electron configuration of the preceding element of group 0. This blueprint explains why the chemistry of the elements normally involves only valence electrons. As well much energy is required to either remove or share the inner electrons.

Table \(\PageIndex{2}\): Successive Ionization Energies (in kJ/mol) for the Elements in the Third Row of the Periodic Table.Source: Information from CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (2004).
Element	\(I_1\)	\(I_2\)	\(I_3\)	\(I_4\)	\(I_5\)	\(I_6\)	\(I_7\)
*Inner-shell electron
Na	495.viii	4562.4*	—	—	—	—	—
Mg	737.vii	1450.7	7732.vii	—	—	—	—
Al	577.four.4	1816.7	2744.8	11,577.four.iv	—	—	—
Si	786.five	1577.1	3231.half-dozen	4355.5	16,090.vi	—	—
P	1011.8	1907.4.iv	2914.1	4963.6	6274.0	21,267.four.3	—
S	999.half dozen	2251.8	3357	4556.2	7004.three	8495.8	27,107.4.3
Cl	1251.two	2297.7	3822	5158.6	6540	9362	11,018.2
Ar	1520.6	2665.9	3931	5771	7238	8781.0	xi,995.iii

Example \(\PageIndex{1}\): Highest Fourth Ionization Free energy

From their locations in the periodic table, predict which of these elements has the highest quaternary ionization energy: B, C, or N.

Given: 3 elements

Asked for: element with highest fourth ionization energy

Strategy:

List the electron configuration of each element.
Determine whether electrons are being removed from a filled or partially filled valence shell. Predict which element has the highest quaternary ionization energy, recognizing that the highest free energy corresponds to the removal of electrons from a filled electron core.

Solution:

A These elements all prevarication in the 2d row of the periodic tabular array and have the following electron configurations:

B: [He]iisouthward ⁱⁱtwop ¹
C: [He]2s ²2p ^two
N: [He]iis ²iip ³

B The fourth ionization free energy of an chemical element (\(I_4\)) is divers equally the free energy required to remove the fourth electron:

\[E^{3+}_{(thousand)} \rightarrow East^{4+}_{(g)} + e^- \nonumber \]

Because carbon and nitrogen have 4 and five valence electrons, respectively, their fourth ionization energies correspond to removing an electron from a partially filled valence shell. The quaternary ionization free energy for boron, however, corresponds to removing an electron from the filled ones ² subshell. This should require much more than free energy. The actual values are every bit follows: B, 25,026 kJ/mol; C, 6223 kJ/mol; and N, 7475 kJ/mol.

Do \(\PageIndex{ane}\): Everyman 2d Ionization Free energy

From their locations in the periodic tabular array, predict which of these elements has the lowest second ionization free energy: Sr, Rb, or Ar.

Reply: \(\ce{Sr}\)

The kickoff column of data in Table \(\PageIndex{two}\) shows that commencement ionization energies tend to increase across the third row of the periodic table. This is considering the valence electrons exercise not screen each other very well, assuasive the constructive nuclear charge to increase steadily beyond the row. The valence electrons are therefore attracted more strongly to the nucleus, so diminutive sizes decrease and ionization energies increase. These furnishings represent two sides of the same money: stronger electrostatic interactions between the electrons and the nucleus further increment the free energy required to remove the electrons.

Figure \(\PageIndex{1}\): A Plot of Periodic Variation of Outset Ionization Free energy with Atomic Number for the Offset 6 Rows of the Periodic Table. There is a subtract in ionization energy within a group (about easily seen here for groups i and 18).

However, the first ionization free energy decreases at Al ([Ne]3south ²iiip ¹) and at Southward ([Ne]iiis ²iiip ⁴). The electron configurations of these "exceptions" provide the respond why. The electrons in aluminum'due south filled iiisouth ² subshell are better at screening the iiip ^ane electron than they are at screening each other from the nuclear charge, and so the s electrons penetrate closer to the nucleus than the p electron does and the p electron is more than easily removed. The decrease at Due south occurs because the two electrons in the aforementioned p orbital repel each other. This makes the S atom slightly less stable than would otherwise exist expected, every bit is true of all the group 16 elements.

Figure \(\PageIndex{two}\): Kickoff Ionization Energies of the *south*-, p-, d-, and f-Block Elements

The first ionization energies of the elements in the first vi rows of the periodic table are plotted in Effigy \(\PageIndex{1}\) and are presented numerically and graphically in Figure \(\PageIndex{two}\). These figures illustrate three important trends:

The changes seen in the second (Li to Ne), fourth (K to Kr), fifth (Rb to Xe), and sixth (Cs to Rn) rows of the south and p blocks follow a pattern like to the design described for the third row of the periodic tabular array. The transition metals are included in the 4th, fifth, and 6th rows, however, and the lanthanides are included in the 6th row. The beginning ionization energies of the transition metals are somewhat similar to 1 some other, every bit are those of the lanthanides. Ionization energies increase from left to right across each row, with discrepancies occurring at ns ² np ¹ (group 13), ns ⁱⁱ np ⁴ (group xvi), and ns ²(n − ane)d ^ten (group 12).
First ionization energies generally decrease down a column. Although the principal quantum number n increases downward a column, filled inner shells are constructive at screening the valence electrons, so there is a relatively small increment in the effective nuclear charge. Consequently, the atoms get larger equally they learn electrons. Valence electrons that are further from the nucleus are less tightly leap, making them easier to remove, which causes ionization energies to decrease. A larger radius typically corresponds to a lower ionization energy.
Considering of the beginning 2 trends, the elements that class positive ions well-nigh easily (accept the everyman ionization energies) lie in the lower left corner of the periodic table, whereas those that are hardest to ionize prevarication in the upper right corner of the periodic table. Consequently, ionization energies mostly increase diagonally from lower left (Cs) to upper correct (He).

The darkness of the shading inside the cells of the tabular array indicates the relative magnitudes of the ionization energies. Elements in gray have undetermined first ionization energies. Source: Information from *CRC Handbook of Chemical science and Physics* (2004).

Generally, \(I_1\) increases diagonally from the lower left of the periodic table to the upper correct.

Gallium (Ga), which is the showtime chemical element following the first row of transition metals, has the following electron configuration: [Ar]4due south ²3d ¹⁰ivp ¹. Its starting time ionization energy is significantly lower than that of the immediately preceding chemical element, zinc, because the filled 3d ¹⁰ subshell of gallium lies inside the ivp subshell, shielding the unmarried 4p electron from the nucleus. Experiments accept revealed something of even greater interest: the second and third electrons that are removed when gallium is ionized come from the 4south ^two orbital, not the 3d ¹⁰ subshell. The chemistry of gallium is dominated by the resulting Ga³ ⁺ ion, with its [Ar]3d ¹⁰ electron configuration. This and similar electron configurations are particularly stable and are oftentimes encountered in the heavier p-block elements. They are sometimes referred to equally pseudo element of group 0 configurations. In fact, for elements that exhibit these configurations, no chemical compounds are known in which electrons are removed from the (n − 1) d ¹⁰ filled subshell.

Ionization Energies of Transition Metals & Lanthanides

As we noted, the first ionization energies of the transition metals and the lanthanides alter very niggling beyond each row. Differences in their second and third ionization energies are also rather small, in sharp contrast to the pattern seen with the south- and p-block elements. The reason for these similarities is that the transition metals and the lanthanides course cations by losing the ns electrons before the (north − i)d or (due north − 2)f electrons, respectively. This means that transition metal cations have (northward − i)d ^{due north} valence electron configurations, and lanthanide cations have (n − two)f ^north valence electron configurations. Because the (n − 1)d and (north − 2)f shells are closer to the nucleus than the ns shell, the (n − 1)d and (n − 2)f electrons screen the ns electrons quite finer, reducing the effective nuclear charge felt by the ns electrons. As Z increases, the increasing positive accuse is largely canceled by the electrons added to the (n − 1)d or (northward − 2)f orbitals.

That the ns electrons are removed earlier the (n − 1)d or (n − 2)f electrons may surprise you because the orbitals were filled in the opposite order. In fact, the ns, the (northward − 1)d, and the (northward − 2)f orbitals are and so close to one another in energy, and interpenetrate one some other so extensively, that very minor changes in the effective nuclear charge can change the order of their energy levels. As the d orbitals are filled, the constructive nuclear charge causes the 3d orbitals to be slightly lower in energy than the 4due south orbitals. The [Ar]3d ² electron configuration of Ti² ⁺ tells usa that the fours electrons of titanium are lost before the iiid electrons; this is confirmed by experiment. A like pattern is seen with the lanthanides, producing cations with an (n − two)f ⁿ valence electron configuration.

Because their first, 2nd, and 3rd ionization energies change then fiddling across a row, these elements have important horizontal similarities in chemical properties in addition to the expected vertical similarities. For example, all the first-row transition metals except scandium grade stable compounds equally M²⁺ ions, whereas the lanthanides primarily form compounds in which they exist every bit Yardⁱⁱⁱ⁺ ions.

Example \(\PageIndex{ii}\): Everyman Showtime Ionization Energy

Utilise their locations in the periodic table to predict which element has the lowest first ionization energy: Ca, K, Mg, Na, Rb, or Sr.

Given: six elements

Asked for: element with everyman kickoff ionization free energy

Strategy:

Locate the elements in the periodic table. Based on trends in ionization energies across a row and downwardly a column, identify the chemical element with the lowest first ionization energy.

Solution:

These six elements grade a rectangle in the two far-left columns of the periodic table. Because we know that ionization energies increase from left to correct in a row and from bottom to top of a cavalcade, we tin predict that the chemical element at the bottom left of the rectangle volition have the lowest kickoff ionization energy: Rb.

Exercise \(\PageIndex{2}\): Highest First Ionization Free energy

Use their locations in the periodic table to predict which element has the highest commencement ionization energy: As, Bi, Ge, Lead, Sb, or Sn.

Answer: \(\ce{Equally}\)

Summary

The trend of an element to lose electrons is one of the most important factors in determining the kind of compounds it forms. Periodic behavior is most axiomatic for ionization energy ( I ), the energy required to remove an electron from a gaseous atom. The energy required to remove successive electrons from an atom increases steadily, with a substantial increase occurring with the removal of an electron from a filled inner shell. Consequently, only valence electrons can be removed in chemical reactions, leaving the filled inner crush intact. Ionization energies explain the common oxidation states observed for the elements. Ionization energies increase diagonally from the lower left of the periodic tabular array to the upper right. Minor deviations from this trend can be explained in terms of especially stable electronic configurations, called pseudo noble gas configurations, in either the parent atom or the resulting ion.